Pregnant Report

Pregnancy information, what to expect when you are expecting, and the latest pregnancy news

Pros and Cons of Circumcision

Subscribe to Comments for "Pros and Cons of Circumcision"

Replies

Tim's picture
Submitted by Tim on

Perhaps I should be looking into this more? I cannot find sense for removing a portion of the penis (actually the most contacted portion during coitus) which is natures' enclosure to the males' urinary opening and cover of the penile glans (which is most like the clitoris in a female) all the while claiming that doing so will result in something better (healthier, more attractive, more enhanced, ect,,,) than natures' design. Duh,,,?

  In the past and still today I find many claims and studies all promoting this while dismissing the frequent post-op complications as insignificant or due to parental fault since most infants are dismissed from the medical provider long before the circumcision healing process has had time to reveal post-op complications. If a complication occurs it's not the medical providers' fault unless the complication is noted prior to dismissal, hence the motive for prompt dismissal. The fact that most complications are not life-threatening, and the baby has been through enough trauma already, seems to be the excuse for not treating the complication/s. This also means their complications will not be treated or reported in the child's health history.  However these complications are evident to have occured post-op/post dismissal by scars or defomities identified in later years. Sometimes not until his adult sex life is impeded by such. 

 If we could not find logic for removing ANY part, portion, or function of the female body back in the 80's, when the anti-FGM bill was passed, we must have then forgotten to reconsider what we had begun doing to males since only a short time earlier. 

Now we have a new outlook coming from a society that promotes outward appearances as superior to function. Recently it has brought a medical business of cosmetic vulva reduction or (labia plasty, and/or clitoral reduction) to light as new and better way to refine the female body. And this is performed on minors too. If I must state my opinion to that, I'd say it's better off performed under a medical providers care than by the typical home setting through which most females ouside the United States would endure FGM.

 But where is the end to cutting up our child's genitalia? Where do we draw the line? Should we be at liberty to do what we prohibit others to do because we can do it "safely", "painlessly" and we think that the asthetic appearance is "benefitial"? I cannot discern any difference in logic behind this "female genital reduction" and male circumcision. Are we going to agree to let our children be cut to less than nature intended for our own reasoning because we can do it without looking as crude as the cultures who have practiced it for their own "cultural" reasons?

My opinion is: that we need to be logical, of a compassionate heart and maintain the liberty of all our persons in our borders. Letting our children be forced to accept and undergo circumcision is a hypocracy when we are prohibiting others to do similar to their own children.

Feel welcome to email me at metaltaskman@yahoo.com

thanks

Leave a Reply

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.